At one point, I noticed how EADs are quite a bit harder to evoke in the Shannon-Bers model than in ToR-ORd. I.e., when I ported key currents (ICaL, INaL, IKr, IKs) to the newly created model built closer to the Bers/Grandi framework, it would still not generate EADs as readily in the right conditions as models like ToR-ORd. The difference was not huge, but it was noticeable. In a separate investigation, when I was trying to build an understanding of differences in each current in either framework, I noticed how relatively different is the voltage-dependence – near-linear in ToR-ORd, but sublinear in the Shannon model. And there I had a spark of thinking that clarified why the Shannon-like models could be naturally less prone to EAD formation, arising from the sodium-potassium pump differences. Let’s go over this in more detail.
Below is shown a comparison of the linear voltage-dependence
used in T-World, versus the sublinear voltage-dependence of the
sodium-potassium pump used in the Shannon model and its successors.
Here, fnak in Shannon was scaled down to 89% to reflect the
fact that when using this scaling, one gets a highly comparable behaviour of
the cell to the one with a linear dependence. As seen below, the action
potential (top left), calcium transient (top right), and sodium concentration
after 100 beats are very similar between such models.
Now, the bottom right plot shows the sodium potassium pump
current, and a difference is much more substantial there. You can check how the
shape of the current corresponds to the voltage-dependence shown in the
previous plot. During early plateau, above ca. 0 mV, the sublinear
(Shannon-based) pump’s current is lower than that of the linear – and that’s
exactly what you’d expect based on the comparison of the voltage dependency
curve in the previous plot. On the other hand, below ca. 0 mV, the Shannon
(red) curve in the voltage dependency plot is higher, and that is why the pump
current is higher too – until the diastolic potential is reached, where the
models meet again.
Early afterdepolarisations with the L-type calcium current in
T-World tend to take-off around – 10 mV. As you can see from the top left
panel, this happens around 200 ms. And looking back at the NaK pump on the
bottom right panel of the above figure, that is where the sublinear-based pump
produces a markedly higher current. I.e., there is more repolarising current at
this point of simulation, and that is why an aspiring early afterdepolarisation
faces stronger opposition and is less likely to develop. (In reality, EADs happen in models
with reduced repolarization reserve, starting much later than at 200 ms; this
plot merely illustrates that when the EAD-friendly membrane potential is
reached, INaK is higher in the sublinear model.)
With regards to experimental evidence on linear/sublinear
voltage-dependence, the classical study by Nakao & Gatsby of 1989
shows the following (Figure 4C):
Different voltage-dependence curves represent three levels
of intracellular sodium ([Na]pip – what is in the pipette controls
the intracellular concentration). What can be seen there is that the
voltage-dependence is clearly sublinear at 50 mM sodium. However, at the
physiological level of 8 mM, it is pretty linear, certainly up to ca. 40 mV,
i.e., for the range of membrane potentials relevant for a cardiac action
potential. The rest of the paper by Nakao and Gadsby mostly uses 50 mM
intracellular sodium to get results in other figures, and that is probably why
this condition was mainly used to develop models. This data at 50 mM were also
used to develop the Luo-Rudy
model of 1994 , where the formulation in the Shannon model comes from (see
Figure 9 of the Luo-Rudy model, also carried out at intracellular sodium of 50
mM). This point aside, I think
that one take-home message I took from my years making models is that the
Luo-Rudy model is INSANE. So many things done right, even with limited
information of the time, so much complexity that made sense. It really is a
monumental piece of work.
For some time, I wanted to use the ORd/ToR-ORd model of the
sodium potassium pump, but that became untenable when I noticed in another
project that the pump’s representation in those models is quite problematic
with regards to extracellular potassium changes. Briefly, the model doesn’t
show much of a reduced pump rate with hypokalaemia. This issue is quite
stealthy, and that is why I missed it until relatively recently – it does not
show when the same unphysiologically high sodium concentration is used as in
its reference study; i.e., the model matches the underlying data, it’s just
those data are not in physiological condition. However, when physiological
sodium levels are used, this issue appears and can cause problems in certain
domains of application – additional plots and discussion are around the
Supplementary Figure S3 in the T-World paper.
In the end, we used an approach closer to the Bers/Grandi
model of sodium-potassium pump, but one with a linear dependence on membrane
potential. The moment we switched from sublinear to linear and adjusted pump
rate to maintain reasonable sodium and potassium levels, EADs started appearing
more readily.
Altogether, this section illustrates just how much
experimental conditions matter, and a model working perfectly in
unphysiological conditions may be surprisingly problematic in physiological ones.
Comments
Post a Comment